Name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals stopped being a college-only story years ago -- a real, growing number of high school athletes are now signing them too, for local business endorsements, social media sponsorships, and camp appearances. But the rules governing high school NIL are genuinely different from the college version, vary by state in ways that actually matter, and share one hard line every state draws in the same place: NIL money can't be the thing that gets you recruited.

The state-by-state patchwork, and where it's still restricted

Most states now permit some form of high school NIL activity, following the same legal wave that opened up college NIL after the NCAA's rules changed. But it isn't universal -- Texas, Alabama, Michigan, and Indiana are among the states that still generally prohibit or sharply restrict deals that trade on a student's athletic reputation specifically, even where general endorsement activity might otherwise be allowed. The details genuinely vary by state athletic association, not just by state legislature, which means the actual rule that applies to you depends on where you go to high school, not on some single national standard -- check your state high school athletic association's own NIL policy directly rather than assuming what applies in a neighboring state applies to you too.

What "boosters and collectives can't run this" actually means

The rule that shows up consistently across states that do allow high school NIL is a restriction on who can be involved, not just what the deal covers. Michigan's high school association, for example, allows an athlete to pursue individual endorsements, appearances, and merchandise deals directly -- but explicitly bars the school itself, coaches, boosters, and NIL collectives (the pooled-donor entities that have become common at the college level) from arranging or participating in those deals. Wisconsin's high school association has stated plainly that collectives have "no place in high school sports." That's a meaningful distinction from how NIL works once an athlete is enrolled in college, where booster-funded collectives are now a normal, if controversial, part of the landscape.

The rule every state shares: NIL can't buy your enrollment

Whatever a given state allows or restricts, one line holds everywhere NIL is permitted at all: NIL compensation cannot be used as a recruiting inducement -- it can't be the thing that persuades a recruit to enroll, keep attending, or transfer to a particular school. That's the direct legal boundary between a legitimate endorsement deal (a local business pays you to promote its product because of who you are) and a disguised pay-for-enrollment arrangement (someone pays you specifically because you're about to commit somewhere), which is exactly the distinction our piece on how college athletic recruiting actually works draws between a real recruited-athlete hook and money changing hands to manufacture one. It's also the same boundary the college-level NIL Go clearinghouse exists to police: since launching in mid-2025, the system -- run by Deloitte on behalf of the College Sports Commission -- has reviewed every third-party college NIL deal worth more than $600 specifically to check it reflects genuine market value for real promotional work, not a disguised recruiting payment; it cleared more than $355 million in deals through mid-2026 while rejecting tens of millions more that didn't pass that test. High school NIL doesn't run through that same clearinghouse, but the underlying legal problem it exists to catch -- pay disguised as an endorsement -- is the same one state high school associations are trying to prevent with the booster/collective restrictions above.

The part that actually affects a financial aid application later

NIL income is real, taxable income, and it can eventually show up on financial aid paperwork the same way any other income does -- worth knowing now if you're a recruit currently earning NIL money and thinking ahead to your own college financial aid picture. Because the FAFSA uses prior-prior-year tax data, income earned as a high school senior or college freshman typically doesn't affect FAFSA-based aid until roughly two years later, which can mean it never shows up at all if the money stops before then. Schools that require the CSS Profile instead of or alongside the FAFSA work differently -- the CSS Profile asks for projected earnings for the coming year rather than relying on older tax-return data, so NIL income can affect institutional aid the same year it's actually earned, not two years later.

What this means for you

  • Check your specific state high school athletic association's NIL policy directly -- this isn't federal law, and neighboring states can have genuinely different rules; Texas, Alabama, Michigan, and Indiana are among the most restrictive right now.
  • A deal that only exists because you're about to commit to a specific school is the one thing every state's rules exist to block, even in the states most permissive about everything else -- a real endorsement has to reflect real promotional value, not a disguised recruiting payment.
  • If your state allows NIL but restricts booster and collective involvement, be wary of any deal that traces back to a specific program's supporters rather than an independent business -- that's precisely the arrangement most states have written rules to catch.
  • Track your own NIL earnings and keep records for tax purposes -- NIL money isn't withheld like a paycheck, and it's real self-employment income you're responsible for reporting.
  • If a college on your list requires the CSS Profile, understand that NIL income you're currently earning could affect your aid offer sooner than it would under FAFSA-only aid -- plan your senior-year and freshman-year NIL activity with that timing difference in mind.

Sources